Carnegie Market Blog

 

Are Stocks Really Better than Bonds?

Posted by Brent Luce on Jun 10, 2016 3:21:22 PM

Quote of the Week

“He who is not courageous enough to take risks will accomplish nothing in life.” – Muhammad Ali 

Bonds Versus Stocks

A widely held belief among investors is that over time, equities will do better than bonds.  While I believed this to be true, I thought it would be interesting to test this.  I was particularly interested in what happened if someone were unlucky enough to have invested all of their money in stocks near the peaks prior to the two major bear markets experienced in the past 30 years.  The chart below shows the current value of $100,000 invested in stocks and bonds on a given date in the past.  To clarify, if one had invested $100,000 in stocks in 1988, he/she would currently have around $1,600,000.  Investing the same amount in bonds would have resulted in a current value of $600,000. 

Looking back over the past thirty years, there is only one short period of time where buying bonds and leaving it there until today would have been better than stocks – the bull market peak before the 2000-2002 bear market.  Even in this case, bond out performance has been marginal.  Interestingly, even if one had invested in stocks at the peak of 2008, right before the biggest bear market since the Great Depression, they would still have been better served being in stocks.  MORE:  Why Stocks Outperform Bonds

Read More

Topics: Recession, Non-Farm Payrolls, Investor Sentiment

Share this Blog


 

Carnegie Cropped eBook No Shadow-min

"Top 4 Questions to Ask Before Hiring a Financial Advisor"

What You'll Learn

  • The difference between fiduciary and suitability standards
  • Learn how some advisors may not be required to work in your best interest
  • Be aware of various types of hidden costs
  • The importance of third party custodians
  • The difference between fee-based and fee-only

Download Your Copy of the eBook Below

Recent Posts

Subscribe here for monthly blog updates!