Carnegie Market Blog

Better Earnings, Stronger Job Numbers, Higher Rates

Posted by Brent Luce on Nov 6, 2015 5:30:00 PM

Non-Farm Payrolls

Non-farm payrolls for October were much better than expected, coming in at 271,000 versus an expected 185,000.  This means that market was up today and that people were applauding the surprisingly strong economic data, right?  WRONG!  Conversely, the market digested it as a signal that the Fed will increase rates sooner rather than later, which is theoretically bad for most stocks.  Looking into the specifics, high-income stocks like REITS and Utilities were down the most, and Financials were relatively strong.  Further, the dollar moved strongly higher on this news, which is a negative for the materials and energy stocks.

Non-Farm Payrolls (15 years)
Non-farm payrolls 25 years

Interest Rate Hike

Below is a chart of the implied probability of the Fed raising interest rates in December.  As you can see, this measure has recently skyrocketed:

 Implied Probability of Fed Rate Hike in December
Implied Probability of Fed Rate Hike in December
 

Q3 Earnings Scorecard

The table below shows Q3 S&P 500 earnings by sector.  As earnings season winds down, every sector has seen more companies beat expectations than miss.  Perhaps the Q4 market strength has something to do with the unexpectedly good earnings.  I don’t have the data at my fingertips, but I know that revenues were not as strong as the earnings shown below.

 S&P 500 Q3 Earnings 

The Experts

Someone forwarded the chart below to me.  It suggests that as usual, the “experts” and the media were very bearish after the Aug/Sept decline.  Meanwhile, the market has experienced a double digit advance since the lows…

Market Experts chart 

Nasdaq 100

The Nasdaq 100 is at new multi-year highs and close to all-time highs.  It is amazing that it has taken fifteen years for this index to overcome the losses of 2000-2003.  To most people, this implies that if they had been invested in a collection of NDX 100  stocks back then that they would finally be back to break-even if they had held them throughout the years.  This is NOT the case.  Since the index is constantly kicking out the losers and adding winners, the performance of the index is much different than buying and holding the underlying securities.  CLICK HERE to look back at some of the Nasdaq 100 changes back in time.  You may not recognize many of these companies, and in fact, some do not even exist today.  

Nasdaq 100 – Since 1997
Nasdag 100 Since 1997

Index Returns

 Index repots November 6, 2015

Topics: Stocks, Economy

Brent Luce

Written by Brent Luce

Brent Luce Senior Portfolio Manager Cleveland, OH. Brent serves Carnegie Investment Counsel as Senior Portfolio Manager. Brent manages custom portfolios for select clients and is an integral part of Carnegie’s investment selection and portfolio structuring processes. He is also author of the “Carnegie Market Blog”. Email Brent at bluce@carnegieinvest.com.

  • There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.

carnegie top 4 things 2021 version-1

Looking to hire a Financial Advisor?

Enclosed in our eBook are four questions we recommend you ask any prospective group you review. Plus, you'll learn: 

  • The difference between fiduciary and suitability standards
  • Learn how some advisors may not be required to work in your best interest
  • Be aware of various types of hidden costs
  • The importance of third party custodians
  • The difference between fee-based and fee-only

Download Now, It's Free

Recent Posts

Subscribe here for monthly blog updates!